FAQs

Still curious about Shoot For Good? Watch a VIDEO of some photos from our previous Shoot For Good days narrated by co-founder Jennifer Ditona-Garcia.

1.) Do my pictures have to be shot in Hampton Roads, VA?

Answer

2.) Who can participate in Shoot For Good?

Answer

3.) How will my photograph be used?

Answer

4.) How do I submit my picture?

Answer

5.) How long do I have to submit my picture?

Answer

6.) How many pictures may I send in?

Answer

7.) Do I have to take my picture(s) within the SFG Day 24-hour period?

Answer

8.) How much of my day will this consume?

Answer

9.) What if I cheat?

Answer

10.) How much may I alter the image?

Answer

11.) Color or black and white? Horizontal or vertical or square?

Answer

12.) May I use my cellphone camera?

Answer

13.) May I shoot my picture on old-fashioned film?

Answer

14.) Who’ll own my picture?

Answer

15.) What about the caption?.

Answer

16.) What happens to my picture?

Answer

17.) Will I get paid?

Answer

18.) Can I remain anonymous?

Answer

19.) Do I need to get permission from my subject to submit their photo to the website?

Answer

Have more questions?

Answer

2 Comments


  1. Susan Lowe
    Oct 04, 2010

    Do I need the subjects permission to submit their picture to you and for your use?


  2. Tom Feist
    Oct 10, 2010

    Susan, I’m just seeing your post and wanted to offer a clarification, or at least my way of thinking on the matter. I am by no means an expert, but I am an MBA and have done a LOT of reading regarding releases. As a traveler, I often take pictures of people and have no way to communicate to ask for a release. I have come to my own conclusion: I do not release 99% of my photos. My reasoning is, if you release a photo, most of the time it positively ruins the spontaneity of the moment and furthermore it legally obligates you–in complicated “legalese” ways I cannot ever hope to understand–to the exact language of that release. If you–OR THE PEOPLE YOU SELL OR PROVIDE IT TO–step outside (even unknowingly) the exact usages prescribed in that release, as the photog YOU ARE LIABLE for damages to the model. Ouch. However, if you do not seek to model release a photo, then sell it or provide it to another party, as long as you openly state it is NOT RELEASED, the person who buys it assumes the risk if they want to use it. Because of this transferred risk, stock photography companies positively require releases. Exactly. Because if 20,000 people buy your photo from a stock company and one of those buyers misuses it, they want the PHOTOG to be liable for damages and not them. It’s one reason I do not shoot stock photos, or deal with those companies. Here again, this is my attempt to explain my own thinking regarding the eternal “to release or not release” debate and offer you a “…see Spot run…” level interpretation of the issue (i.e., as much about it as I understand).

Leave a Reply